On Bambi's blog, we learn Nick Denton, who runs Gawker Media (owner of Valleywag), is going to take over the writing of ValleyWag, so he can focus more on real news. Bambi writes:
"He's looking forward to changing the perception of ValleyWag, as a gossip site about "sex" in the Valley, to a site reaching a broader audience with less interest about trivial scandals and far more interested in the financial impact Silicon Valley has on the world."
Except, of course, the first dribble of a story about "the financial impact Silicon Valley has on the world" is a rather uninformed rumor: (Denton) tells me that he has a juicy scoop about John Battelle's Federated Media advertising network losing a major client. The loss is a "slap in the face" to Battelle, says Denton.
While we'd hate to lose any author, I've said many times that we expect to. While we haven't lost one all year long, we know that fact can't stand. Some might be acquired (As Reddit recently was, though we are still serving their ads for now, and the rumors swirling around Digg's acquisition continue). Some might just want to try a new model or align with a traditional media company (we see that with some partners like Fark, for example, who is working with Maxim on parts of its business , while we continue with other parts on an exclusive basis). Others might have a change of business or editorial focus. And for any number of good reasons we might decide to part ways with an author because we disagree on how to do business. This is to be expected. This is a new kind of business, and we're all learning.
Overall, FM will continue to grow, regardless of who might move on. As I wrote earlier, we have far more great sites that want to work with us than we can support. In the past two months, we've added four new sales people (we're closing in on 15 great salesfolks now, with offices in three cities and a fourth coming soon) and opened 10 new jobs in sales, engineering, and author services. When the time comes to announce more authors, (and many are already signed on - representing far more pageviews than we "lost" from Fark, btw), we'll be ready to support them.
If Nick truly intends to step it up over at Valleywag by improving its financial and business reporting, I am sure he will exercise a long held journalistic skill: understanding the business model of the subjects he's writing about before presuming to judge them, and contacting us for comment before publishing rumor or speculation.
Update: Well, I was wrong about Nick checking his facts and assumptions first. He's posted that Fark is working with Maxim, which is true (and has been for some time), and that he thought my book was "sycophantic", which is not. But the first is based on fact, and the second opinion, so I have no issue with either (you might ask Eric, Larry, Sergey, or nearly every major reviewer whether they think my book was sycophantic, but I digress). He's also right that Fark was a bit hard for us to sell, but in the end, that had to to with any number of reasons, none of which Nick is aware of (or will be, at least from me). Drew and I remain friends, and we are still representing Fark for remnant and other opportunities outside the Maxim relationship.
Nick points out that I was bullish on Fark in the B2 piece, and I remain that way. But this was no "slap in the face." We stared at each other's businesses, and agreed as gentlemen that Maxim was a better partner for CPM ads. And as much as Nick may wish there was some bitchy, juicy, gossip-laden angle to report here, there is not.
Now, is FM an ad network, a label Nick claims I'd disavow? Of course it is, in part. But it's far more than that. And it's this part of FM's business, the part that goes well past being "just an ad network," that I imagine Nick will never take the time to understand. I can't imagine, however, that his ignorance is really anyone's loss. I have always had respect for what he's done at Gawker, and I will continue to (though certainly his personal attacks irritate me, well, personally).
He does his thing, we'll do ours.